Deputy Minister of Finance releases new transfer pricing decree

Publication date 29 November 2013

On Tuesday, November 26, 2013, the Deputy Minister of Finance released a new decree on transfer pricing. The Deputy Minister’s decree dated November 14, 2013 takes account of recent developments in transfer pricing and cancels the earlier decrees of March 30, 2001, and August 21, 2004. The new decree combines these earlier decrees as well as introducing some new matters or matters that were previously only partially dealt with. The starting point remains the arm’s length principle as codified in the Corporate Income Tax Act 1969. The new decree entered into force on November 27, 2013.

The Deputy Minister has used the new decree to clarify the policy on transfer pricing. While he has succeeded on a number of issues, we would argue that the position taken in a number of cases is open to interpretation. Taxpayers should, nevertheless, anticipate the introduction of this policy. In particular, it is important to ensure there is transfer pricing documentation that explains the commercial rationale behind existing and proposed structures and group transactions and which substantiates functionality. This also applies to financial transactions for which a ‘simple’ benchmark is no longer appropriate. In this respect, the decree is in line with international developments.

The following issues from the new decree are discussed below:

  • intra-group services;
  • financing transactions including non-business motivated loans;
  • combating non-business motivated profit shifting (in particular as it concerns intangible fixed assets, central purchasing within the group and internal insurance/reinsurance activities);
  • guarantees.

Intra-group services

As was the case with the old decree of August 21, 2004, the new decree contains a list of activities that are regarded as being performed in a shareholder capacity. Therefore, the taxpayer should not charge the other group companies for that particular part of the activities. The new decree clarifies this list. It also explains that costs for corporate governance can be regarded as costs relating to mixed activities (group services and shareholder activities).

Intangible fixed assets

The new decree contains a separate section on tangible and intangible fixed assets. This section deals with the situation where an intangible fixed asset is transferred to a group company that does not have the required functionality to manage the risks associated with the intangible fixed asset. Under the new decree, the transfer of assets to an acquiring group company that has no added value is regarded as not being at arm’s length. Because the joint profit will not increase, the price offered by a potential purchaser will be less than the asking price of the potential vendor. According to the new decree, such a transfer would therefore not take place between third parties. With this measure, the Deputy Minister appears to be combating situations where such assets are only contractually relocated to low tax jurisdictions, while the purchaser lacks the required functionality. However, it is also clear that a relocation of the intangible fixed asset within the group must also be substantiated in order to explain the logic behind the transaction from a financial and commercial perspective.

Central purchasing within the group

According to the Deputy Minister, it is generally accepted that the activities performed by local unassociated purchasing agents mostly consist of support activities. Their remuneration is generally based on the cost of the purchases. The Deputy Minister argues that, in practice, it appears difficult to find reliable comparables for a purchasing office, which can be used to carry out a comparison based on a percentage of the cost of purchases. In such situations, the Dutch Tax and Customs Administration will therefore generally apply a cost plus method as test to assess the arm’s length nature of the remuneration. According to the Deputy Minister, this will, in principle, limit the cost base to the purchasing office’s own operating costs, given the routine tasks performed by it, but will exclude the cost price of the purchases. This argument by the Deputy Minister is not new and is based on a judgment rendered by the Supreme Court on April 23, 2004. As this concerned a very specific case, the judgment cannot simply be applied to every situation. It is therefore very important that the substantiation of the payment for purchasing activities is based on a functional analysis and an analysis of the group’s commercial position.

Internal insurance/reinsurance activities

It is standard practice within a group to have group companies that formally act as the group’s internal insurer/reinsurer (also referred to as ‘captives’). According to the Deputy Minister, in some cases these companies lack the activities that are characteristic of a professional insurer/reinsurer, such as product development, marketing and sales, screening of potential policyholders, asset/liability management and developing an independent reinsurance policy. Nor do these companies ‘actively’ diversify (i.e. outside the group) the risks run by the reinsurer in respect of the internal insurance/reinsurance activities; any diversification that takes place is ‘passive’, i.e. within the group. Two types of insurance/reinsurance activities are explained in more detail, i.e. the passive pooler and insurance as by-product. The Deputy Minister is of the opinion that these cases solely involve an administrative function that justifies no more than a limited payment. This argument appears to lump all internal reinsurers together. However, in practice, many internal insurers/reinsurers are set up with a functionality that justifies a much higher payment than, for example, cost plus. Given the policy described in the new decree, it is very important to substantiate and document the commercial reasons for setting up an internal insurer/reinsurer, as well as its functionality.

Guarantees

There are various reasons for providing guarantees to group companies for loans granted in associated relationships. If the group company is not able to independently − without a guarantee from associated companies − raise a loan on the capital market, the guarantee will be provided in a shareholder capacity. According to the Deputy Minister, this does not involve a chargeable group service. Even if the group company is able to independently raise a loan, the extent to which it can negotiate conditions that are more favorable than they would be with an explicit guarantee from an associated company, must be assessed. The underlying reason for this is that the group company has a higher credit rating by virtue of its inclusion in the group and therefore can borrow under more favorable conditions. The new decree refers to this as an implicit guarantee, but this also does not involve a chargeable group service. According to the Deputy Minister, a fee for an explicit guarantee can only be charged if the guarantee exceeds the value of the implicit guarantee.

The amount of an explicit guarantee fee is partly dependent on the credit rating of the relevant group company and the group as a whole. The rates given in the example used in the decree are as follows:

  • interest on the basis of the standalone rating (i.e. of the company excluding the group): 6%;
  • interest on the basis of the derived rating (taking into account the fact that the company is part of a group): between 4-6 %;
  • interest on the basis of the group rating: 4%.

The Deputy Minister is of the opinion that the guarantee fee cannot, in principle, be higher than the difference between the interest rate based on the derived rating and the interest rate based on the group rating. In the above example, the guarantee fee should therefore lie between 0-2%.

Determining and documenting the guarantee fees and interest payments will therefore increase the administrative burden for the taxpayer. It is not possible to unequivocally establish what influence the group will have on the credit rating of the party receiving the loan and to whom the guarantee applies. It is therefore important to carefully substantiate and document the choices that were made in determining the credit rating.

Financing transactions

With regard to financing transactions, the new decree states that the conditions (including the price) under which the transaction was entered into must be evaluated to see whether they are the same as the conditions that third parties would have agreed for a comparable transaction entered into under comparable circumstances. The credit rating must also be taken into account in this arm’s length evaluation. The credit ratings AAA through BBB- reflect excellent to adequate creditworthiness (the borrower is also referred to as ‘investment grade’). The Deputy Minister’s position is that only in special circumstances will unassociated borrowers and lenders enter into a loan transaction with a borrower with a credit rating under investment grade/BBB-. Whether this position reflects the reality of the financial markets is debatable. Moreover, the Deputy Minister’s position will further increase the burden of proof resting on the borrower and lender in a financing transaction between associated parties to demonstrate that the loan is at arm’s length. Not being able to meet this burden of proof can result in all or part of the interest or all or part of the write-down on a bad debt being non-deductible.

In its judgment of November 25, 2011 the Supreme Court concluded that if the interest on a loan between associated parties is not determined in accordance with the arm’s length principle, the calculation of the profit for tax purposes must nevertheless be based on interest that is at arm’s length. The interest rate on a non-business motivated loan must − as a rule of thumb − be corrected so that it is line with the interest rate that the borrowing group company would have paid had it borrowed from a third party under the same conditions and in the same circumstances with the lending company acting as guarantor. The Supreme Court did not address the situation where the credit rating of the lender is lower than that of the borrower. In that case, the deemed guarantee would make no difference. The Deputy Minister is of the opinion that in such cases only the risk-free interest on the loan should be taken into account.

Click here to download the memorandum in pdf format

   

Investment in the Netherlands 2014

22 September, 2014 | Publications

Each year KPMG publishes an updated edition of ‘Investment in the Netherlands’, which outlines the Dutch investment climate.…

Read more

Tax measures for 2015

17 September, 2014 | News

On Budget Day, September 16, 2014, the Cabinet presented the 2015 Tax Plan to the Lower House.…

Read more

International Tax Newsletter - August 2014

08 September, 2014 | News

Every month we publish an e-newsletter which gives you an overview of international tax developments being reported globally by KPMG member firms in the American, Africa, Europe and ASPAC…

Read more

International Tax Newsletter - July 2014

14 August, 2014 | News

Every month we publish an e-newsletter which gives you an overview of international tax developments being reported globally by KPMG member firms in the American, Africa, Europe and ASPAC…

Read more

New tax treaty between China and the Netherla...

13 August, 2014 | News

The new tax treaty between China and the Netherlands will enter into force at the end of August and apply to income received after January 1, 2015. A number of changes that have been made…

Read more

European Court of Justice rules against Danis...

18 July, 2014 | News

The Court of Justice of the European Union held that a Danish provision for recapture of losses sustained in a foreign permanent establishment constitutes a restriction of the freedom of…

Read more

Taxation of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisit...

11 July, 2014 | Publications

KPMG’s Taxation of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions features information from 60 countries on their current laws and regulations and the potential implications for tax-efficient…

Read more

Does temporal ringfencing facilitate creativi...

08 July, 2014 | Publications

Source: Weekblad Fiscaal Recht, 2014/846, pp. 846-856.Author: Laura Cats and Bauco Suvaal On May 27, 2014 the Deputy Minister of Finance, Mr. Wiebes, presented the Memorandum in response…

Read more

International Tax Newsletter - June 2014

07 July, 2014 | News

Every month we publish an e-newsletter which gives you an overview of international tax developments being reported globally by KPMG member firms in the American, Africa, Europe and ASPAC…

Read more

New Tax Regulation between the Netherlands an...

24 June, 2014 | News

On June 10, 2014 the new bilateral rules for the avoidance of double taxation between the Netherlands – including the Caribbean part – and Curaçao (“BRNC”) were announced and…

Read more

EU Council of Ministers agrees with amendment...

23 June, 2014 | News

The amendment means that payments received on cross-border hybrid loans will be excluded from tax exemption as from January 1, 2016.…

Read more

Court of Justice of the European Union rules ...

12 June, 2014 | News

On June 12, 2014 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that Dutch legislation on the fiscal unity for corporate income tax purposes is contrary to the European freedom of…

Read more

International Tax Newsletter - May 2014

10 June, 2014 | News

Every month we publish an e-newsletter which gives you an overview of international tax developments being reported globally by KPMG member firms in the American, Africa, Europe and ASPAC…

Read more

Important decision by CJEU on the dividend wi...

06 June, 2014 | News

The Court of Justice of the European Union in Luxembourg has concluded that the 8.3% dividend withholding tax pursuant to the BRK is permissible subject to certain conditions. …

Read more

International Tax Newsletter - april 2014

12 May, 2014 | News

Every month we publish an e-newsletter which gives you an overview of international tax developments being reported globally by KPMG member firms in the American, Africa, Europe and ASPAC…

Read more

Corporate and Indirect Tax Rate Survey 2014

28 April, 2014 | Publications

Indirect and corporate tax rates on a rollercoaster ride: KPMG International survey reviews the ups and downs…

Read more

Dutch State Profit Share – Recent Supreme Cou...

22 April, 2014 | News

On April 11, 2014, the Dutch Supreme Court provided guidance regarding on the treatment of tariff income for Dutch State Profit Share purposes.…

Read more

International Tax Newsletter - March 2014

07 April, 2014 | News

Every month we publish an e-newsletter which gives you an overview of international tax developments being reported globally by KPMG member firms in the American, Africa, Europe and ASPAC…

Read more

Competitive Alternatives, 2014 Edition

31 March, 2014 | Publications

Of the countries in Western Europe, the Netherlands is the most attractive for foreign companies wishing to locate in this part of Europe.…

Read more

OECD issued public discussion draft on tax ch...

28 March, 2014 | News

On March 24, 2014, the OECD released a public discussion draft on the tax challenges of the digital economy, as part of its base erosion and profit-shifting action plan (Action 1).…

Read more

OECD issued public discussion drafts on neutr...

20 March, 2014 | News

On 19 March 2014, the OECD released two public discussion drafts on the development of model treaty provisions and recommendations for the design of domestic rules to neutralize the effect…

Read more

OECD issued public discussion draft on tax tr...

17 March, 2014 | News

Recently, the OECD issued a public discussion draft on tax treaty abuse as part of its base erosion and profit-shifting action plan.…

Read more

International Tax Newsletter - February 2014

07 March, 2014 | News

Every month we publish an e-newsletter which gives you an overview of international tax developments being reported globally by KPMG member firms in the American, Africa, Europe and ASPAC…

Read more

Action required: new rules on Swiss Principal...

28 February, 2014 | News

Via this alert we would like to inform you about the recently published ‘guidelines’ from the Swiss federal tax administration on the taxation of Principal Companies, which could have a…

Read more

Advocate General at Court of Justice of the E...

27 February, 2014 | News

Under Dutch legislation, a fiscal unity for corporate income purposes cannot be established between sister companies of a foreign parent, or between sister companies and the foreign parent.…

Read more

International Tax Newsletter - January 2014

11 February, 2014 | News

Every month we publish an e-newsletter which gives you an overview of international tax developments being reported globally by KPMG member firms in the American, Africa, Europe and ASPAC…

Read more

Creative temporal ringfencing

06 February, 2014 | Publications

In August 2013, the bill on temporal ringfencing reserves was presented to the Lower House. The bill is a response to the Supreme Court judgment of June 14, 2013. In this article, the…

Read more

Advocate General recommends further review on...

03 February, 2014 | News

On January 30, 2014, Ms. Van Hilten, the Advocate General attached to the Supreme Court, issued her independent opinion on the appeal a taxpayer had filed before the Supreme Court regarding…

Read more

International Corporate Tax Newsletter - Dece...

08 January, 2014 | News

Every month we publish an e-newsletter which gives you an overview of international tax developments being reported globally by KPMG member firms in the American, Africa, Europe and ASPAC…

Read more

Transfer of authority to deal with ‘catch all...

31 December, 2013 | News

To improve the speed with which requests for the application of the catch all clause contained in tax treaties are dealt with, the Ministry of Finance has decided to transfer the processing…

Read more

The Supreme Court requests preliminary ruling...

24 December, 2013 | News

The Supreme Court has requested preliminary rulings on Dutch dividend withholding tax levied on non-resident private shareholders and foreign companies.…

Read more

Tax treatment of additional Tier 1 capital

18 December, 2013 | News

Banks will be able to deduct, for tax purposes, the return on additional Tier 1 capital, even if it was issued after January 1, 2014.…

Read more

Main features new tax regulation between the ...

16 December, 2013 | News

On December 12, 2013, the Netherlands and Curaçao reached agreement on a new tax regulation for the avoidance of double taxation between the two countries.…

Read more

International Corporate Tax Newsletter - Nove...

06 December, 2013 | News

Every month we publish an e-newsletter which gives you an overview of international tax developments being reported globally by KPMG member firms in the American, Africa, Europe and ASPAC…

Read more

European Commission proposes amendments to Pa...

25 November, 2013 | News

On November 25, 2013, the European Commission proposed amendments to the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive (“the Directive”) in order to close off perceived opportunities for corporate tax…

Read more

ITR World Tax 2014

13 November, 2013 | News

KPMG Meijburg & Co. has been ranked 'Tier 1' in the recently published ITR World Tax 2014.…

Read more

Transfer Pricing Interpreter

04 October, 2013 | Page

KPMG Meijburg & Co Global Transfer Pricing Services has developed Interpreter. Using this software, your transfer pricing system can be documented as accurately as possible, in accordance…

Read more

Transfer Pricing Documentation Solution

04 October, 2013 | Page

The Transfer Pricing Documentation Solution of KPMG Meijburg & Co Global Transfer Pricing Services offers companies an efficient tool for meeting the Dutch statutory documentation…

Read more

Advance Pricing Agreement

04 October, 2013 | Page

KPMG Meijburg & Co Global Transfer Pricing Services can obtain such advance certainty for you by consulting with tax authorities, in the Netherlands or abroad, in order to arrive at…

Read more

Value Chain Management

26 September, 2013 | Page

KPMG Meijburg & Co advises businesses engaged in strategically transforming their national or international procurement, sales, production, service, or other processes. This may for…

Read more

Transfer Pricing

18 September, 2013 | Page

The tax authorities of OECD countries are becoming increasingly aware of how their tax proceeds are affected by the transfer prices multinationals use. As a result, national transfer…

Read more

Bill on deferral of payment of exit taxes

17 December, 2012 | Publications

The bill foresees an amendment to the Tax Collection Act and provides for the possibility of deferring payment for corporate and personal income tax purposes. This article discusses in…

Read more

Section 20a: the test moment tested

13 September, 2012 | Publications

Source: NTFR 2012/2126, pages 7-13 Author(s): Bauco Suvaal Uncertainty exists in the tax practice, and possibly also in judicial circles if a recent judgment rendered by the District Court…

Read more